I don’t really understand your question(s).

But…

1.I have heard of Cayce. And I don’t agree with everything he has said. I don’t trust ppl who go into trance and simply talk. We do not know what is channelling through them exactly.

2.You do not need to think too much on Prasangika or Madhyamika on their own. Lord Tsongkapa has condensed everything into the Lam Rim for you. The Lam Rim cannot be wrong in any way, otherwise Tsongkapa’a enlightenment was false. Please follow the Lam Rim thoroughly and effect a perception change…then it will be ok…everything will be ok for you…everything will lighten for you….focus very much on the practice of any form of Manjushri as your yidam..do the practices, offerings and sadhanas….Manjushri will help your mind tremendously….I would be happy for you..

Good luck…TR

Dear Suriya,

What an entertaining question. It is amazing this type of thought would come up in your mind.

My name TSEM TULKU RINPOCHE is legal.

Thanks.

Having been vegetarian/vegan since 1968, I’ve probably heard just about every rationalization attempt extant for continuing to eat our sisters and brothers in the animal realm. However, those who’ve not read Gautama Buddha’s teachings on me…at-eating might be surprised to learn He left no wiggle room in stating:

“If one is trying to practice dhyana (spiritual meditation) and is still eating meat, he would be like a man closing his ears and shouting loudly, and then asserting that he heard nothing. . . . How can a bhikshu (student of spirituality) who hopes to become a deliverer of others, himself be living on the flesh of other sentient beings? . . .S/he who causes suffering shall suffer; there is no escape. “

“To avoid causing terror to living beings, let the disciple refrain from eating meat. . . .The food of the wise is that which is consumed by the sadhus (holy men); it does not consist of meat. . . .There may be some foolish people in the future who will say that I permitted meat-eating, and that I partook of meat myself, but. . .meat-eating I have not permitted to anyone, I do not permit, and I will not permit meat-eating in any form, in any manner, or in any place; it is unconditionally prohibited for all.”–Gautama Buddha, 5th Century, B.C. (“Dhammapada”)

Likewise, after years of requesting of my friend and teacher since 1982 that he speak out decisively to Buddhists about meat-eating, the Dalai Lama stated. . .again, without wiggle room:

“I do not see any reason why animals should be slaughtered to serve as human diet, when there are so many substitutes. After all, man can live without meat.”

Personally, I’ve just recently joined this unparalleled, global, social-networking experiment called Facebook, but like you, Rinpoche, I’ve already enjoyed spreading compassion into others’ hearts, and I’m delighted to see you speaking out in behalf of those who can’t.

Finally, anyone interested in more compassionate wisdom on this subject may wish to visit my ‘Dennis Paulson’ FB Page, where every day you’ll find a different COMPASSION FOR ANIMALS quotation from celebrated ones among our sisters and brothers, speaking from their heart just as Rinpoche did here. Big Love and Peace of mind; your friend and theirs, Dennis

(Dennis Paulson left a message on my Facebook post. I found it quite powerful. I have reproduced here for everyone to read. Anyways, many ppl can read on the comments of the post, but that will get pushed down eventually…so it’s here now to stay and to share continuously. I will have more quotes extracted from his wonderful FB page as he recommended to share with all of you on this post. So this post will continue to grow…must check back to it from time to time…please share these quotes wherever you can…help the animals please… Tsem Rinpoche)

*******************************************************************

Dear EG,

I pasted from the page in mention above. If you read it carefully, this is what Dennis Paulson wrote to me that he has been vegetarian since 1968. It is not referring to myself.

In regards to what I did not like about the geshe system, I will not talk about it at this time. Maybe in my book later if I can see a benefit in mentioning it. I would not want to say things about the Monastery that would seem negative at this time.

Thanks….Tsem Rinpoche

Dear EG,

I don’t recall writing this…maybe I forget? Where did you see this please?

I was 3 years old in 1968.

When a person hesitates, you know they are giving it a thought although it won’t really happen.

The person they consistently avoid, you can tell they have a some mental barrier against that person or what that person represents. You can see how strong their aversion is towards something hence giving you a clue to the way their mind operates.

If they pick quickly and do not really care that shows an easy mind that is not so attached to what the choices represents.

The same questions do not work for everyone. The questions may be similar but different choices involved.

I invented it myself and it has worked quite well.

Thanks.

If you ‘cannot’ ‘give up’ something, make sure the process in which you ‘acquire’ it does not harm anyone involved.

Choosing one person or no strings attached is up to the individual but always protect yourself and others.

If you were to be only involved with ppl who practice tantra, then you would not be going to the dharma centres for the right reasons. I think anyone with or without tantra beliefs is fine.

Dear Terry,

What deep questions:

1. Re UFO’s, bigfoot, etc…i just listen to the simple ppl who are eye witnesses who do not want anything and they just share what they saw. What is there not to believe?

2. In regards to Dharma, it is so hard to explain. I just believed since I was very young. No one had to convince me nor cajole me. It came from deep within and from another part of my mind I can’t explain. It will be different for anyone. The process of belief is so different for everyone. It is hard to pinpoint one single formula and method. I am sorry for that. You have to find your way, but a good start is consistency in your dharma studies…TR

Dear Bertram,

I do wish I went to a University, but not that deep of regrets that I didn’t. I was very set as a child not wanting to go to University.

I did not go for the geshe degree but it does not mean I have not studied. There’s were many things I noticed in the Geshe system I did not want to be involved with. There were a few Geshes that inspired me and many that did not. In regards to the degree, that does not matter to me so much. Teachers such as Lama Yeshe, Lama Zopa, etc never went for their Geshe degree.

The path for the spiritual education is so different for everyone. Some have very ‘little’ education and go so far. Some have so much and disrobe. And then there are the few who have great spiritual education and get very far also. It is different. We have to find the one that is right for us and not be swayed by the names and awards involved. After all, it is for our spiritual growth.

Dear Greg,

Interesting question…thanks.

Yes, this was the name I used when I modelled.

I had few students go online and search for interesting names. I wanted something ethnic and different and short and easy…so one of my students found Kai online which means Ocean in Hawaiian. I liked it very much..It was easier introducing myself to the various ppl who I went for casting call as Kai then TSEM TULKU RINPOCHE….lol.

Dear Zhengdao,

1. You can use a thangka or statue or both. Either is fine.
2. A traditional Gelug altar is Tsongkapa in the centre, Shakyamuni on the left (as we look at the altar) and Tara is on the right. In front you can put pictures of your teachers as you like as they are all the same in your meditations.

3. Or if you prefer, you can just put one single statue such as Tsongkapa or Shakyamuni to represent all the Buddhas.

Don’t be so worried, you will not go wrong…..

TR

Dear Anne,

When I speak, I speak from my heart and if it comes out eloquent and ppl wish to follow that is their choice. If what I say makes sense to them, then it is not up to anyone to say what they can and connot do as that is conversion also. I do not speak to convert, but I speak to share. So either I don’t speak at all, or when I speak, I don’t speak well? I cannot control their minds. Sorry if this upsets you so much.

TR

Dear Izabella,

I do not think you need to rush into anything right now. What is important is to find the right path for you. If you observe your mother and she is a good person or doing her best to become better, then perhaps the Buddhist teachings was beneficial for her and therefore something to respect. And maybe something good for you also. It is powerful when a child does prayers or migtseyma for a parent. It benefits the parents alot. Good luck.

I am a Dratsang Tulku (Monastery Tulku).
Thanks

Dear Blaine,
When I say one should not criticize others gurus, that is a general statement to help us watch our speech. To avoid hurting the sentiments of other centres/traditions and students.

Very often in the last 30 years I have come across ppl in one centre criticizing another lama or centre when they know nothing about the other lama/centre. My advice is for that. To not criticize other lamas/centres and traditions.

As for disputes involving lamas and lay people, I withhold comments as each case is individual and I have no right to comment. Furthermore I do not know the circumstances involved.

We have registered with the Govt of Malaysia (ROS). We have their approval and permissions. We are proud to be in Malaysia and to be under the Malaysian Government that is democratic, respects all religions and allows their practice.
In Malaysia, the highest law of the land for Dharma centres is the Malaysian Govt. To respect the Malaysian Govt we only abide by their governance.

I can’t recall anymore….sorry.

Dear Craig,

To make a long story short, yet complete, these are the deities that Lord Tsongkapa practiced Himself.

Tsongkapa practiced many deities, but he kept Yamantaka surpreme of his practices along with Heruka, and Guhyasamaja and recommended it to his followers.

Vajra Yogini was kept as his most secret practice. It was so secret, that no one knew He was practicing till after His parinirvana.

Also during the degenerate age (now) Kyabje Dechen Nyingpo or Pabongka Dorje Chang recommended highly we practice Vajra Yogini. The practice is shorter than the Yamantaka, Heruka, etc but complete. The visualizations are simpler, shorter and less but just as effective. Vajra Yogini is highly recommended.

I do not mind if my future incarnations will be female. It might be more effective. The problem is I have no control of my future incarnations yet. Thanks.

Dear Chris,

At our level all fundamental causes cannot be understood. We have to accept that for now. Understanding the timelessness, and the infinitude of a mind is beyond our comprehension for the moment.

What is important is not to stand at the shore of Japan gazing across the pacific looking for the coast of California. We will never see it no matter how much it is described to us. Right now deal and learn with what is in front of you, master it and then move onto to the next level. When that is done, then gradually you will be able to perceive what was at first the unperceivable or infinitude.

Only on the third watch and fourth watch of the night was the historical Buddha able to perceive all causes and it’s inter-relatedness as it was too infinite. Too far back.

I hope this helps.

Chakras are not individual. You may share it with whomever you like. Thanks.