From the Elephant Journal-Interesting
I found this article very interesting… take a read.
Tsem Rinpoche
The Marketplace of Ideas
The Statue of Liberty stands as a proclamation of Western, secular freedom and dignity, welcoming all with the words of Emma Lazarus:
“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore.”
This principal is what underlies the ideals of the American experiment. American culture is an amalgamation of other cultures—the melting pot—fueled by the freedom of experimentation and the primitive mandate or right to express your true self in an open and creative way. America is an open exchange of ideas, information, and experience—a marketplace of ideas.
I am not referring to the “economic” market place. Rather, by free market I am referring to the cultural space that accommodates experimentation and evolution. The free market of ideas is not guided by fame or profit, but by a practical realization of personal truth. Intellectual speculation is transformed into direct experience, whether confused or sane, through an experimental process guided by the intelligence of trial and error.
Progressive Buddhism
Buddhism as a whole is entering this chaotic, powerful American free market. The Theravadin, Zen, Korean, Tibetan, Vietnamese, and Pure Land traditions are all planting roots here in the West. In addition to the traditional lineages, academia is making a contribution. Intellectuals are evaluating these Eastern traditions from the point of view of medicine, psychology, and sociology, and submitting their opinions. As a result, American Buddhism is emerging as a unique mixture of this wide array of disciplines. It is an American, or progressive Buddhism.
This progression seems to be at somewhat of a crossroads. For the first time in this process, we are beginning to see a significant number of American practitioners offer their experiences back into the marketplace of ideas, and something else is beginning to emerge. This “something else” is distinctly our own. However, this “something else” is producing a great deal of friction. There are those who understand that Buddhism is a timeless and culturally universal vehicle of human realization that isn’t, fundamentally, in need of modification—the mind and heart’s experiences and meditation practices developed around them are timeless. On the other hand, there are others who see that Buddhism is in the midst of a reformation—the evolution of a tradition in search of its Western expression, just as a unique Buddhism has emerged within every country or culture it has come to. This is the American-Buddhist experiment.
All experiments seek to produce an experience. This experience is an evolving product, which is dependent upon an open exchange of ideas, practices, and insights. Progressive Buddhism is not a “brand” of Buddhism. Some people call it “Integral Buddhism,” which seems to place the emphasis on the form. I appreciate the term Progressive Buddhism, as it places emphasis on the process. Through experimentation, Western practitioners develop some familiarity with the teachings and practices offered to them by their Asian brothers and sisters. Then, they turn around and share their experiences. Their contribution fundamentally changes the landscape, as the landscape is fluid. It is nothing more than the flow of information. Over time the atmosphere has changed so much that a distinct example of Buddhist spirituality is revealed. It is still Buddhism, but it is no longer “Asian Buddhism.”
All experiments seek to produce an experience. This experience is an evolving product, which is dependent upon an open exchange of ideas, practices, and insights. Progressive Buddhism is not a “brand” of Buddhism. Some people call it “Integral Buddhism,” which seems to place the emphasis on the form. I appreciate the term Progressive Buddhism, as it places emphasis on the process. Through experimentation, Western practitioners develop some familiarity with the teachings and practices offered to them by their Asian brothers and sisters. Then, they turn around and share their experiences. Their contribution fundamentally changes the landscape, as the landscape is fluid. It is nothing more than the flow of information. Over time the atmosphere has changed so much that a distinct example of Buddhist spirituality is revealed. It is still Buddhism, but it is no longer “Asian Buddhism.”
For a lot of Westerners, Asian Buddhism is an approachable practice, but there are reasons why Asian Buddhists developed the cultural leanings seen in the various traditions developed in the east. It is through culture that the practice is made directly relevant to the audience. The union of culture and practice begets ritual and symbolism, which introduces the practitioner to the primordial Truth that sustains a movement. This is a natural process of assimilation that every religion goes through when it is introduced to a new culture. Padmasambhava utilized the existing Bon tradition when introducing Buddhism to the Tibetan people; Taoism played a huge role in the development of Zen; Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche dug deep into the western psyche, utilizing concepts of chivalry, dignity, and courage—all principles associated with the legends of King Arthur and other medieval myths—in order to communicate his Shambhala lineage.
As we, the American people, study these practices and develop our own experiences, we feel compelled to share our insights, humble as they may be. So, we reintroduce the practices to the marketplace of ideas, but this time with a different cultural slant. This slant enables more people to relate to the practice, which invites even more people to experiment with the process. This is what fuels the evolution of the market.
This evolution is further exacerbated by the technology at our disposal. Westerners are experimenting with these ideas in their formal practice and their daily lives. Then, sharing their insights with the network of people at their disposal, which for the first time in Buddhism’s history, includes the internet. Your average Joe Blow could, theoretically, reach more people with the click of a mouse than Milarepa did in his entire lifetime! (However, Milarepa has continued to inspire despite his absence…good luck Joe Blow!)
The technology of our modern society, coupled with our laissez faire approach, leads to a drastic shift in the presentation of the collective experience in a relatively short period of time. As Western practitioners develop autonomous ideas that are verified through practice they cease to be dependent upon their Asian counterparts for validation. So, as the practitioners become autonomous, the tradition becomes autonomous—within the context and thread of lineage and devotion—as the tradition is nothing more than the expression of the collective experience.
Who can contribute to the marketplace of ideas?
In short, anyone and everyone.
Why doesn’t the market become flooded with bad ideas?
Buddhism is practical. Eastern Buddhism is immensely practical—particularly for the cultures it grew up out of. People are interested in a spirituality that relates to their daily life. In the long term, it is practical results, not fame or profit, that drives the free market of ideas:
“The defining characteristic of the emerging Western Buddhism is a basic pragmatism, rather than an adherence to some philosophical system or sectarian viewpoint. What most characterizes the One Dharma of the West is an allegiance to a very simple question:
What works?
What works to free the mind from suffering? What works to accomplish the heart of compassion? What works to awaken us from the dream states of our ignorance?”
~ Joseph Goldstein
What works?
This is what guides the progressive Buddhist. What are these ideas working towards? A fundamental experience of the human condition. Regardless of race, creed, sexual orientation, or nationality, there is a tendency to experience ourselves in a narrow-minded and unsatisfactory way. In the west, we tend to be trapped between our ears—we experience ourselves as if we were a series of ideas. From the depths of our being emerges a primitive force that seeks fulfillment—an uncensored and unmediated direct experience of our ever-expanding larger Self. The emerging Buddhism will be a path that provides this force with a relevant and practical way to actualize itself. If it does not strike a chord in the heart of the American people, it will soon be discarded. Charlatans may gain fame and profit in the short term, but only those messages that contain depth and weight will endure.
“This institution will be based upon the illimitable freedom of the human mind. For here we are not afraid to follow truth wherever it may lead, nor to tolerate any error so long as reason is left free to combat it” ~ Thomas Jefferson
This allegiance to Truth suggests that Progressive Buddhism will not only be practical, but also non-sectarian. First, practitioners study the dharma in a variety of different contexts. Then they test their ideas in their practice and daily lives. Next, they begin to contribute their amalgamated experience to the market place of ideas. Often times, their points of view draw from non-Buddhist sources, such as Christianity, Judaism, and the sciences. These “non-Buddhist” points of view are successful in the market place of ideas, because they make the content all the more relevant and accessible to their audience. Finally, a new trend emerges in the world of Buddhism.
Within this emergent Buddhism, which seems to be guided by an abstract intelligence (the market), not a tangible institution, who is considered a teacher?
Within this emergent Buddhism, which seems to be guided by an abstract intelligence (the market), not a tangible institution, who is considered a teacher?
To continue and finish reading the rest of this insightful article, click here.
Source: http://www.elephantjournal.com/2011/09/free-market-buddhism-and-the-question-of-authority/
Please support us so that we can continue to bring you more Dharma:
If you are in the United States, please note that your offerings and contributions are tax deductible. ~ the tsemrinpoche.com blog team
In the 21st century CE, many people have been practicing Buddhism since day one. Buddhism has since flourish from India ,Tibet and China to other part of the world. Well, It has continue to develop to accommodate the modern world and society. During the centuries, Buddhism has evolved into different branches and in spite of all this diversity, Buddhism has a relative unity and stability in its moral code. Many Masters and Great Lamas went to great length to preserve their lineage and its traditions. Due to various factors such as immigration, globalization, there was and increased interest among Westerners in Buddhism. A specific form and concept of Buddhist modernism has changed then. Practicing meditating, fasting, chanting, recitation, practicing yoga, has changed the life for the better for many practitioners. Interesting read.
Thank you Rinpoche for sharing this article.
Thank you Rinpoche for sharing this article.
Indeed I will look for any “hybrid” type of dharma like Brad Warner books when (sneak) introducing dharma into people in the US, or refer to Western types of teachers who can speak to people in certain dispositions such as Rinpoche, Pema Chodron, Ajahn Brahm, etc. I feel that Americans need something loose which covers a variety of topics, speaks their language, and especially requires no commitment (off the bat at least). Americans who are spiritual shopping can be very disenchanted with religion in general, need to be thoroughly convinced just to meditate, and tend to combine it all with their other spiritual shopping. That is my experience with myself and other friends at least.
The thought of “Americanized Buddhism” sort of makes me sigh… because you can learn the proven traditions and it will inevitably have your own spin anyway, intentional or not. Yeah, Tibet developed its own Buddhist schools with some cultural aspects, but it arrived straight from Indian gurus and took centuries to establish. Apparently for America 53 years is all it takes… that must be the case, we’re just faster, right? Or maybe we want to do faster yoga, to move to the TV faster, get our work done faster, and go through life the same way, as fast, and create a tradition which facilitates this with no one higher up to challenge us. Thankfully I’ve never come across any “wild and crazy” hybrid American Buddhist schools; and amazing, qualified teachers are spreading dharma here. But oh my goodness, please no American Buddhism just yet. Wait until 2200, space travel, Maitreya, or whichever comes first.
I find it very interesting. I am not surprise that they have this kind of idea for Buddhism. It was not something new because many countries adopted Buddhism hundreds of years ago from India but the way they practice today is very different already. It is to suit the mind of the people at that time and that situation or condition in that country. The bottom line is whatever and whichever directions this new age Buddhism is going to take, we must have a very high attained lineage master to lead and guide the way if not it will be too dangerous to just form something new and everyone started to practice.
I like how this interesting piece is written and how the author think how the teachings will be judged as to whether it works or not. I also understand that the teaching may not not right away and it may take time to work. Application of the dharma is important because is it applied in the correct manner or skillfully. What may not work now can work later. So i do admire the spirit of adventurism of the Americans in exploring Buddhism and perhaps another form of Buddhism will emerge from this.
This however does not invalidate the people who subscribe to one tradition and follow it through for the rest of their lives. There are masters and teachers in each tradition who still bring realizations and happiness to others, so call me fixated but I do want to bet on a tried and proven path whereby there are still living masters who have achieved spiritual results from adhering to a particular practice and tradition.
Rinpoche,
I just wanted to stop in and say thank you, very much for sharing this article.
Yours truly,
Ben Riggs
Benjamin, You are very welcome. Tsem Rinpoche
I do agree that, sooner or later, a unique form of Buddhism will develop in the US – just as has happened in every other country that has taken Buddhism into its heart.
The lineages of the old Masters are important, and will undoubtedly be followed to a large extent – but the west will develop its own Masters over time, perhaps synchronizing the old lineages with new insights and experience.
As the world becomes more and more cosmopolitan, the Dharma must also or risk losing its relevance(And I pray this never happens!).
Thank you for this thought provoking article Rinpoche. I have always appreciated the fact that Buddhism is a religion that is one the one hand, steeped in tradition, and on the other hand, unafraid to be subjected to tests, experiments and changes. The core teachings of the Buddha has displayed tremendous resilience in the face of tremendous changes over the last 2500 years. Buddhism today is the fastest growing religion and I guess that is because it is not a rigid philosophy.
However I am not sure I agree with practitioners of progressive Buddhism having too much autonomy with their spiritual experimentation and expression. I feel that the old Masters went to great length to preserve a lineage and its traditions for good reasons and a lineage is not merely a set of “collective experience”. Perhaps that is just the Asian in me.
very logical.good ideas should be share among sentient beings.praise all the enlightened activities.praise all the Buddhas three period of times.may all beings attain nirvana and liberation.