The Eighth Tatsak Jedrung, Yeshe Lobzang Tenpai Gonpo. Image credit: himalayanart.org. Click on image to enlarge.

རྟ་ཚག་རྗེ་དྲུང ༠༨ ཡེ་ཤེས་བསྟན་པའི་མགོན་པོ།

b.1760 – d.1810

Incarnations: Tatsak Jedrung རྟ་ཚག་རྗེ་དྲུང།
Tradition: Geluk དགེ་ལུགས།
Geography: Pasho County དཔའ་ཤོད་རྫོང།
Historical Period: 18^th Century ༡༨ དུས་རབས། / 19^th Century ༡༩ དུས་རབས།
Institution: Kumbum Jampa Ling སྐུ་འབུམ་བྱམས་པ་གླིང།; Drepung Gomang Dratsang སྒོ་མང་གྲྭ་ཚང།; Pasho Gon དཔའ་ཤོད་དགོན་པ།; Kundeling ཀུན་བདེ་གླིང་།
Name Variants: Lobzang Tenpai Gonpo བློ་བཟང་བསྟན་པའི་མགོན་པོ།; Tatsak Kundeling Jedrung རྟ་ཚག་ཀུན་བདེ་གླིང་རྗེ་དྲུང།; Tenpai Gonpo བསྟན་པའི་མགོན་པོ།

The Eighth Tatsak Jedrung, Yeshe Lobzang Tenpai Gonpo, was born in 1760 Meljo (mal jo) in the Powo (spo bo) region of Kham. His father’s name was Gyara Darlu Tsering (rgya ra dar lu tshe ring) and his mother’s was Dawa Butri (zla ba bu khrid).

At the age of five he was identified as the reincarnation of the Seventh Tatsak Jedrung, Lobzang Pelgyen (rta tshag rje drung 07 blo bzang dpal rgyan, b. 1708). This incarnation line, also known as the Olga Jedrung (‘ol dga’ rje drung), traces its origin to Baso Chokyi Gyeltsen (ba so chos kyi rgyal mtshan, 1402-1473), who was a disciple of Tsongkhapa Lobzang Drakpa (tsong kha pa blo bzang grags pa, 1357-1419) and the younger brother of Khedrubje Gelek Pelzang (mkhas grub rje dge legs dpal bzang, 1385-1438). The title Tatsak (rta tshag) began with the Fourth incarnation, Lhawang Chokyi Gyeltsen (rta tshag 04 lha dbang chos kyi rgyal mtshan, 1537-1603), whose reincarnation was the first to be titled Tatsak Jedrung, the Fifth in the line.

Upon recognition as the Eighth Tatsak Jedrung, he was enthroned and entered Pasho Monastery (dpa’ shod dgon pa), Genden Samdrub Ling (dpa’ shod dge ldan bsam ‘grub gling) in Chamdo (chab mdo), Kham, which had been established by Baso Chokyi Gyeltsen in 1473. There he studied under Khenchen Zasak Pelden Drakpa (mkhan chen dza sag dpal ldan grags pa, d.u.) from 1767 to 1771, from whom he received his genyen (dge bsnyen) or lay vows.

The 3rd Changkya, Rolpai Dorje. Image credit: himalayanart.org. Click on image to enlarge.

One year later, at the age of twelve, he went to Kumbum (sku ‘bum) Monastery, one of the major Geluk monasteries of Amdo, and then proceeded to Chengde, a summer palace of the Qing emperors on the Chinese-Mongolian border where Tibetan lamas were frequently in residence. At Chengde he developed strong connections to the Third Changkya, Rolpai Dorje (lcang skya 03 rol pa’i rdo rje, 1717-1786), who gave him his novice (dge tshul) vows and the name Yeshe Tenpai Gonpo. In 1772 he travelled to Beijing where he was received in an audience with the Qianlong Emperor (r.1735-1799). The emperor treated him as a “lama of the seal” (tham ga bla ma), the highest official imperial designation enjoyed by Tibetan and Mongolian Buddhist lamas, and provided him with gifts, thirteen servants, and an official’s allowance. From 1774 onward he studied with the abbot of Tashilhunpo (bkra shis lhun po) Monastery of Chengde, Shartse Khenpo Nominhan Lobzang Jampel (shar rtse mkhan po nom min han blo bzang ‘jam dpal). When the Sixth Panchen Lama, Pelden Yeshe (paN chen 06 dpal ldan ye shes, 1738-1780) made his historic visit to Chengde in 1780, the Qianlong Emperor presented the twenty-year-old Tatsak to him, dressed in a dragon robe.

He travelled to Lhasa in 1781, and studied at Gomang (sgo mang) College of Drepung Monastery (‘bras spungs dgon) for eight years. His teachers were the Eighth Dalai Lama, Jampel Gyatso (tA la’i bla ma 08 ‘jam dpal rgya mtsho, 1758-1804), the Second Jamyang Zhepa Konchok Jigme Wangpo (‘jam dbyangs bzhad pa 02 dkon mchog ‘jigs med dbang po, 1728-1791), and Longdol Ngawang Lobzang (klong rdol ngag dbang blo bzang, 1719-1794). In 1782, he was ordained by the Eighth Dalai Lama.

He maintained ties to Beijing during this time, and sent birthday congratulations to the Qianlong emperor in 1786. In 1786 he was appointed as the Dalai Lama’s assistant after the previous regent, the First Tsemonling, who had also served as the Sixty-first Ganden Tripa, Ngawang Tsultrim (tshe smon gling 01 ngag dbang tshul khrims, 1721-1791), was called away from the regency by the Emperor and summoned to return to Beijing. Although the Dalai Lama had come of age and assumed full leadership at this time, Qing documents indicate that Beijing viewed him as lacking in skill and better suited for religious matters than for ruling Tibet.

Qianlong Emperor. Image credit: Wikipedia. Click on image to enlarge.

In 1788, the year of the first Gurkha invasion from Nepal, the Emperor granted Yeshe Lobzang Tenpai Gonpo the title of “lama of the seal” with the geographic designation of Dolug an Nag ur (i.e. Dolonnor in Inner Mongolia) and summoned him to Beijing. However, he did not manage to reach Beijing before being sent back to Lhasa to serve as regent, an order promulgated in an edict on May 26, 1789. The Qianlong Emperor ordered that a “grand lama” was needed to “mutually help” the Dalai Lama, and stated that the Taktsak was a good choice because his character was clear, he profoundly understood the classics, and was respected by the Tibetans. This entry bestowed on him the title of biliketu (畢里克圖), a type of hutuktu (呼圖克圖) incarnation, and office of jasagh lama (prince of the church). The office, created by the Qing court, was based on the Mongol title of jasagh, which was used to refer to princes recognized as descendants of Chinggis Khan. The Qing term was conferred upon leaders of imperial monasteries, and connoted a combination of religious and secular power. It bears noting that the Qingshilu only recorded the title as “jasagh”, instead of “jasagh lama,” but Joachim Karsten has found the title listed as “jasagh lama” presumably in other texts. Emperor Qianlong’s exact orders were to return to Tibet, to assist the Dalai Lama in all matters, and to obtain the compliance of the kalon (bka’ blon) or prime minister. This appointment has been characterized by historians as a practical Qing assumption of rule in Tibet.

Less than a year and a half later, on September 28, 1790, the regent was removed from office by the Emperor and summoned to Beijing. The edict declaring his removal from power reasoned that he was not “diligent and careful” in handling the affairs of the Dalai Lama, unlike the previous regent, who had in contrast “handled matters extremely well.” The same edict recalled the Dalai Lama’s younger brother to Beijing, accusing him of numerous corrupt actions, including “market fraud, seizing farmland, improperly honoring with silk the ‘Red Hat’ (meaning Karma Kagyu) lama that had disrespected the ‘Yellow Hat Religion’ (that is, Geluk), commanding from the same seat as the Demo hutuktu and the Tatsak hutuktu, withholding pay from numerous lamas, taking the Dalai Lama’s possessions, and cutting in half the pay for the tea carriers who come to Tibet and deserve their full road fare.” It explicitly stated that the Dalai Lama was innocent and did not benefit from any of these indiscretions, and similarly this edict did not directly implicate the regent in any of these crimes. The edict also called for the installment of the trusted previous regent back into power, stating that the Dalai Lama was not competent at government-related matters and should only focus on his religious studies. However, the First Tsemonling was only back in power for four months in Lhasa when he died in April, 1791.

The First Tsemonling, Ngawang Tsultrim, who had also served as the Sixty-First Ganden Tripa. Image credit: himalayanart.org. Click on image to enlarge.

The Tatsak had not even reached Beijing when he was ordered by the Emperor to return to the regency. The edict sending him back to Lhasa retracted the Emperor’s previous criticism, stating that the Tatsak was actually “suitable and cautious in handling matters. There is no hostility from the past. This opinion was a mistake.” It is unclear what caused this change in the emperor’s opinion, but it is possible that the untimely death of the First Tsemonling had not given the Qing enough time to groom another figure for the position, and the Tatsak’s close ties with the court made him the best option for replacement.

From the beginning of his regency to about 1794, the Tatsak resided at the Lhakgo Khangsar (lhag sgo khang gsar) palace. In 1794, the Qing Emperor established the Kundeling (kun bde gling) Temple in Lhasa near the Potala Palace and offered it to that Tatsak in celebration of the success of the Gurkha War. A Qing inscription translated by Hugh Richardson at the site of the monastery states that the Chinese military commander Fu Kang’an (d.1796) and the amban Helin, who served in Lhasa in 1793, founded it as a religious offering for the military victory. The inscription also gives possession of the temple to the Tatsak in perpetuity. It henceforth served as the seat of the Tatsak incarnation, and subsequent incarnations of the Tatsak Jedrung were also known as the Kundeling Hutuktu.

H.H. the 8th Dalai Lama, Jampel Gyatso. Image credit: himalayanart.org. Click on image to enlarge.

After the 1804 death of the Eighth Dalai Lama, the Qing record of the process of selection of his reincarnation shows that the regent was able to supersede the Qianlong Emperor’s 1793 stipulation that the Golden Urn was to be used for the identification of all subsequent Dalai Lama incarnations – an attempt on the part of the Qing to control the means of identifying major incarnations. He held a prayer for the rebirth of the Eighth Dalai Lama, which was printed and distributed all over Tibet, and was in charge of the selection of the Ninth Dalai Lama, Lungtok Gyatso (ta la’i bla ma 09 lung rtogs mtsho, 1805-1815) in 1808. An edict from this same year by the Jiaqing Emperor (嘉慶, r. 1796-1820) inscribed on a set of stone tablets outside the Jokhang Temple attempted to justify the omission of the use of the Golden Urn while still maintaining the case that the Qing held influence over the process. It stated that the selection was made after the Dalai Lama had chosen a set of correct objects that had belonged to the previous Dalai Lama, arguing that the process in this case was legitimate, but that the Golden Urn must be used in the future.

The regent died on December 30, 1810 at the age of fifty-one, at Kundeling Monastery. Conflicting accounts of his death exist; either he died peacefully, or he committed suicide. The absence of records of his death in the Qing Imperial Records (Qing shi lu) despite being available for his predecessors, raises questions as to whether or not he was held in good regards by the Emperor at the time of his death.

Teachers

• The Eighth Dalai Lama, Jampel Gyatso ཏ་ལའི་བླ་མ ༠༨ འཇམ་དཔལ་རྒྱ་མཚོ། b.1758 – d.1804
• The Third Changkya, Rolpai Dorje ལྕང་སྐྱ ༠༣ རོལ་པའི་རྡོ་རྗེ། b.1717 – d.1786
• The Seventieth Ganden Tripa, Ngawang Chopel དགའ་ལྡན་ཁྲི་པ ༧༠ ངག་དབང་ཆོས་འཕེལ། b.1760 – d.1839

Previous Incarnations

• Baso Chokyi Gyeltsen བ་སོ་ཆོས་ཀྱི་རྒྱལ་མཚན། b.1402 – d.1473
• The Second Tatsak Jedrung, Wonpo Lhakyab རྟ་ཚག་རྗེ་དྲུང ༠༢ ལྷ་སྐྱབས། b.1474 – d.1508
• The Third Tatsak Jedrung, Liyul Chogyel རྟ་ཚག་རྗེ་དྲུང ༠༣ ལི་ཡུལ་ཆོས་རྒྱལ། b.1509 – d.1526
• The Fourth Tatsak Jedrung, Lhawang Chokyi Gyeltsen རྟ་ཚག་རྗེ་དྲུང ༠༤ ལྷ་དབང་ཆོས་ཀྱི་རྒྱལ་མཚན། b.1537 – d.1603
• The Fifth Tatsak Jedrung, Ngawang Chokyi Wangchuk རྟ་ཚག་རྗེ་དྲུང ༠༥ ངག་དབང་ཆོས་ཀྱི་དབང་ཕྱུག། b.1606 – d.1652
• The Sixth Tatsak Jedrung, Ngawang Konchok Nyima རྟ་ཚག་རྗེ་དྲུང ༠༦ ངག་དབང་དཀོན་མཆོག་ཉི་མ། b.1653 – d.1707
• The Seventh Tatsak Jedrung, Lobzang Pelden Gyeltsen རྟ་ཚག་རྗེ་དྲུང ༠༧ བློ་བཟང་དཔལ་རྒྱན། b.1708 – d.1758

Subsequent Incarnations

• The Ninth Tatsak Jedrung, Ngawang Lobzang Tenpai Gyeltsen རྟ་ཚག་རྗེ་དྲུང ༠༩ ངག་དབང་བློ་བཟང་བསྟན་པའི་རྒྱལ་མཚན། b.1811 – d.1848
• The Tenth Tatsak Jedrung, Ngawang Pelden Chokyi Gyeltsen རྟ་ཚག་རྗེ་དྲུང ༡༠ ངག་དབང་དཔལ་ལྡན་ཆོས་ཀྱི་རྒྱལ་མཚན། b.1850 – d.1886
• The Eleventh Tatsak Jedrung, Ngawang Tubten Kelzang Tenpai Dronme རྟ་ཚག་རྗེ་དྲུང ༡༡ ངག་དབང་ཐུབ་བསྟན་སྐལ་བཟང་བསྟན་པའི་སྒྲོན་མེ། b.1886 – d.1918
• The Twelfth Tatsak Jedrung, Lobzang Tubten Jigme Gyeltsen རྟ་ཚག་རྗེ་དྲུང ༡༢ བློ་བཟང་ཐུབ་བསྟན་འཇིགས་མེད་རྒྱལ་མཚན། b.1924 – d.1956

Bibliography

• Anon. 1984-1997. Rta tshag ye shes bstan pa’i mgon po’i gsung ‘bum dkar chag bod rgya shan sbyar/ mi rigs dpe mdzod khang. In Mi rigs dpe mdzod khang gi dpe tho las gsung ‘bum skor gyi dkar chag shes bya’i gter mdzod, vol. 2, pp. 305-313. Chengdu: Si khron mi rigs dpe skrun khang. TBRC W19837.
• Anon. 1984-1997. Rta tshag ye shes bstan pa’i mgon po’i lo rgyus nyung bsdus/bod rgya shan sbyar/ mi rigs dpe mdzod khang. In Mi rigs dpe mdzod khang gi dpe tho las gsung ‘bum skor gyi dkar chag shes bya’i gter mdzod, vol. 2, pp. 314-316. Chengdu: Si khron mi rigs dpe skrun khang. TBRC W19837.
• Bstan pa bstan ‘dzin. 2003. Rtag tshag rje drung (dbus gtsang kun bde gling) sku phreng rim byon. In Chos sde chen po dpal ldan ‘bras spung bkra shis sgo mang grwa tshang gi chos ‘byung dung g.yas su ‘khyil ba’i sgra dbyangs, vol. 1, pp. 481-518. Mundgod: dpal ldan ‘bras spungs bkra shis sgo mang dpe mdzod khang. TBRC W28810.
• Chab spel tshe brtan phun tshogs and Mi ‘gyur rdo rje. 1991. Bod kyi gal che’i lo rgyus yig cha bdams bsgrigs, pp. 285-286. Lhasa: Bod ljongs mi dmangs dpe skrun khang. TBRC W19220.
• Don rdor and Bstan ‘dzin chos grags. 1993. Gangs ljongs lo rgyus thog gi grags can mi sna. Lhasa: Bod ljongs mi dmangs dpe skrun khang, p. 835. TBRC 19803.
• Dung dkar blo bzang ‘phrin las. 2002. Dung dkar tshig mdzod chen mo. Beijing: Krung go’i bod rig pa dpe skrun khang, pp. 2352, 2355. TBRC W26372.
• Grags pa ‘byung gnas and Rgyal ba blo bzang mkhas grub. 1992. Gangs can mkhas grub rim byon ming mdzod. Lanzhou: Kan su’u mi rigs dpe skrun khang, pp. 730-732. TBRC W19801.
• ‘Jigs med rig pa’i blo gros. 1982. Bstan rtsis kun las btus pa. Xining: Mtsho sngon mi rigs dpe skrun khang, p. 265. TBRC W19804.
• Karsten, Joachim G. “On the Monastic Archives of Kun-bde gling, Lhasa, Including a Preliminary Analytical Historical Study of the Monastery Itself.” University of Bonn. http://www.dtab.uni-bonn.de/articles/kunling.htm.
• Khams sprul bsod nams don grub. 2006. Gangs ljongs grags can mi sna’i ‘khrungs ‘das lo tshigs re’u mig gsal bar ston pa. Beijing: Mi rigs dpe skrun khang, p. 59. TBRC W30439.
• Mi nyag mgon po. et. al. 1996-2000. Rta tshag bstan pa’i mgon po’i rnam thar mdor bsdus (1760-1810). In Gangs can mkhas dbang rim byon gyi rnam thar mdor bsdus. Beijing: Krung go’i bod kyi shes rig dpe skrun khang, vol. 1, pp. 625-628. TBRC W25268.
• Petech, Luciano. 1959. “The Dalai Lamas and Regents of Tibet: A Chronological Study.” T’oung Pao, vol. 47, pp. 368-394.
• Richardson, Hugh. 1974. Ch’ing Dynasty Inscriptions at Lhasa. Roma: Istituto italiano per il Medio ed Estremo Oriente.
• Shakabpa, Tsepon W.D. 2010. One Hundred Thousand Moons: An Advanced Political History of Tibet, Volume 1-2. Boston: Brill.
• Smith, E. Gene. 1969. “Introduction.” Collected Works of Thu’u-bkwan-blo-bzang-chos-kyi-nyi-ma, vol 1, edited by Ngawang Gelek Demo. New Delhi: Gutenberg Printing Press.
• Tu Xia. 2001. “Chang du Qing dai de si da hutuketu” 昌都清代的四大呼图克图 [The Four Major Hutuketus of Chab mdo During the Qing Dynasty]. Zhonguo Zangxue vol. 4, pp. 39-51.
• Ya Hanzhang. 1991. The Biographies of the Dalai Lamas. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.
• Ye shes rgyal mtshan. 1974-1977. ‘Jam mgon bstan pa’i gsal byed mtshungs med rta tshag sprul pa’i sku bi lig thu no mon han ye shes blo bzang bstan pa’i mgon po’i zhabs brtan gsol ‘debs. In Gsung ‘bum/ye shes rgyal mtshan, vol. 12, pp. 171-172. New Delhi: Tibet House Library. TBRC W1022.

Source: Liz Flora, “The Eighth Tatsak Jedrung, Yeshe Lobzang Tenpai Gonpo,” Treasury of Lives, accessed August 03, 2018, http://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Eighth-Tatsak-Yeshe-Lobzang-Tenpai-Gonpo/5328.

Liz Flora received an MA in East Asian Languages and Cultures from Columbia University in 2013.

Disclaimer: All rights are reserved by the author. The article is reproduced here for educational purposes only.

Source: https://treasuryoflives.org/biographies/view/Eighth-Tatsak-Tenpai-Gonpo/TBRC_P302. Click on image to enlarge.

For more interesting information:

• The Dorje Shugden category on my blog
• The Tsongkhapa category on my blog
• The Great Lamas and Masters category on my blog
• “The Tribune” Publishes Dalai Lama Planning to visit China! | “The Tribune”发表达赖喇嘛计划访问中国的新闻！
• China officially supports Dorje Shugden
• The Importance of Tibet Befriending China
• Dalai Lama’s sudden change of mind about China-backed Panchen Lama
• Markham makes it illegal to ban Dorje Shugden（芒康县政府立法严禁人们禁止多杰雄登的修持）
• Why Are Tibetans Leaving India?
• An Open Letter of Appeal to His Holiness the Dalai Lama (April 30, 2018)

Please support us so that we can continue to bring you more Dharma:

If you are in the United States, please note that your offerings and contributions are tax deductible. ~ the tsemrinpoche.com blog team